The Data Institute Acquisition Manual

Home Manual Markets Planning Services Contents

Volume 14

Up Volume 1 Volume 2 Volume 3 Volume 4 Volume 5 Volume 6 Volume 7 Volume 8 Volume 9 Volume 10 Volume 11 Volume 12 Volume 13 Volume 14 Volume 15 Volume 16 Volume 17 Volume 18 Volume 19 Volume 20 Data Grid Financial Market Product Industry MDB

ACQUISITION MANUAL for THE TARGET COMPANY

6
Corporate Development
7
Product Management
8
Overseas Development
9
Product Distribution & Service
10
Advertising + P.R.
16
New Technology Primers
17
Physical Process & Orders
18
Competition Analysis
19
Product Perceptions
20
Customer Perceptions
Financial
Industry
Markets
Products
Data Grids
World MDB
Research MDB
Product MDB
Corporate MDB
Reference MDB

Volume
14

 

Quality & Product Control Handbook

Quality Improvement Financial scenarios are the first topics covered in this part of the Acquisition Manual. This section yields a profit and loss view of the benefits of improving product quality.

Ultimately any product or services which the Company offers has to be of a good quality, otherwise in the long-term the Company will fail.

Achieving a high quality product will involve the Company in short term costs, however these will be rewarded by long term gains.

Long term and lasting profitability at the Company is based on generous commitment to product quality, product control and quality of service.

Increasing competition and competitive products will raise product quality in each of the markets in which the Company operates.

This section analyses all the aspects germane to the pursuit and hopeful capture of high quality products by the Company.

Year-on-year product and service quality improvements are essential for the Company if they are to generate sustained profits.


 

1

Quality & Product Control:


QUALITY

 

RELATIVE INDUSTRY PRODUCTS + SERVICES QUALITY IN THE TRADE CELL

The following chart provides a general representation of relative Products & Services quality in the various Trade Cell markets.

 

INDUSTRY TRADE CELL RELATIVE QUALITY INDEX

COUNTRY

Index

Industry Trade Cell Market / Sector 1

****

Industry Trade Cell Market / Sector 2

****

Industry Trade Cell Market / Sector 3

****

Industry Trade Cell Market / Sector 4

****

Industry Trade Cell Market / Sector 5

****

Industry Trade Cell Market / Sector 6

****

Industry Trade Cell Market / Sector 7

****

Industry Trade Cell Market / Sector 8

****

Industry Trade Cell Market / Sector 9

****

Industry Trade Cell Market / Sector 10

****

Industry Trade Cell Market / Sector 11

****

Industry Trade Cell Market / Sector 12

****

Industry Trade Cell Market / Sector 13

****

Industry Trade Cell Market / Sector 14

****

Industry Trade Cell Market / Sector 15

****

Index of Quality over Time


The above chart shows relative Trade Cell quality for products and services. The mid-point line, indicated as '100' represents the Trade Cell average quality of Products & Services.

[ CORPORATE DATABASES:  The section marked indicates the average quality for products and services marketed by the Company. This will show the relative quality differential between the Company's product quality and the various quality norms. ]

 

INDUSTRY PRODUCTS + SERVICES QUALITY
 

It is essential for the Company to be fully aware of the importance and criticalness of Products & Services Quality.

The arbiter of product quality must be the end user and thus any definition of quality must be decided upon by the customer.

It is not intended here to analyze the actual product quality demanded for Products & Services. This is an evaluation exercise outside the scope of this study, however many End Users perceptions and attitudes are covered in the various survey sections.

Product Quality includes both Products & Services as well as associated or ancillary services, delivery promptness, after-sales services, et cetera.

Products & Services Quality must be analyzed in relation to other product in the market as well as the Company's interaction with the marketplace.

The definition of Product Quality should not consider relative prices or pricing as being part of the definition of Quality.



VALUE SCALE FOR QUALITY

The following Value Scale for Quality will be used below:-

   HQP-LQP

Where,

   HQP = % OF SALES FROM  HIGH QUALITY PRODUCTS

   LQP = % OF SALES FROM  LOW QUALITY PRODUCTS

 


PROFITABILITY & INDUSTRY PRODUCTS + SERVICES

THE TARGET COMPANY PROFITABILITY & INDUSTRY PRODUCTS + SERVICES

****

****

****

****

****

****

****

****

****

ROIc=%

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

+200%

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

+180%

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

+160%

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

+140%

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

+120%

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

+100%

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

+80%

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

+60%

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

+40%

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

+20%

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

0%

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

-20%

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

-40%

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

-60%

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

-80%

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

-100%

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

-120%

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

-140%

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

-160%

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

-180%

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

-200%

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

VALUE SCALE



It will be noticed that if the Company produces no high quality products and services it is less likely to achieve a high profitability.

Producing a relatively high proportion of Products & Services output as high quality products will tend to achieve a higher level of profitability.

By producing a very high proportion of the Product Range output as high quality products will undoubtedly gain the highest levels of profitability.




RELATIVE INDUSTRY PRODUCTS + SERVICES QUALITY & PROFITABILITY

 

CIRCUMSTANCES WHERE ROI IS GREATER THAN THE INDEX

RELATIVE INDUSTRY PRODUCTS + SERVICES QUALITY & PROFITABILITY

CIRCUMSTANCES WHERE ROI IS GREATER THAN THE INDEX

TOTAL
NUMBER of
SUPPLIERS %

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

100%

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

90%

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

80%

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

75%

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

70%

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

65%

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

X

60%

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

X

.

55%

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

X

.

50%

.

.

.

.

.

X

X

.

.

45%

.

.

.

X

X

.

.

.

.

40%

.

.

X

.

.

.

.

.

.

35%

.

X

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

30%

X

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

25%

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

20%

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

15%

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

10%

-20

-10

-0

10

20

30

40

50

60

RELATIVE PRODUCT QUALITY VALUE SCALE


THE TARGET COMPANY

INDEX of YEAR-on-YEAR ROIc = %

2008

****%

2009

****%

2010

****%

2011

****%

2012

****%

2013

****%

2014

****%

2015

****%

2016

****%

2017

****%

2018

****%

2019

****%

2020

****%

... to 2028

****%



Producing higher quality Products & Services is more likely to achieve a higher profitability for the Company.


 

QUALITY / PROFITABILITY & CONCENTRATED MARKETS

 

QUALITY / PROFITABILITY & CONCENTRATED MARKETS

THE TARGET COMPANY

QUALITY VALUE SCALE

LOWER

SAME

HIGHER

MARKET CONCENTRATION

LOW

ROIc=****%

ROIc=****%

ROIc=****%

MEDIUM

ROIc=****%

ROIc=****%

ROIc=****%

HIGH

ROIc=****%

ROIc=****%

ROIc=****%


The benefits of producing high quality products are most dramatic in highly concentrated market situations.

The higher the product quality produced the greater the profitability in a highly concentrated market.

Market Concentration is defined as being the percentage of the market accounted for by 50% of the End Users (in terms of numbers).


 

INDUSTRY PRODUCTS + SERVICES QUALITY & RELATIVE MARKET SHARE

 

INDUSTRY PRODUCTS + SERVICES QUALITY & RELATIVE MARKET SHARE

THE TARGET COMPANY

QUALITY VALUE SCALE

LOWER

SAME

HIGHER

RELATIVE MARKET SHARE

LOW

ROIc=****%

ROIc=****%

ROIc=****%

MEDIUM

ROIc=****%

ROIc=****%

ROIc=****%

HIGH

ROIc=****%

ROIc=****%

ROIc=****%



Both high Products & Services quality and a high level of relative market share will generate greater profitability.

In most cases high product quality can mitigate against a low level of market share and similarly a high market share can mitigate against low product quality.


 

INDUSTRY PRODUCTS + SERVICES QUALITY / PROFITABILITY & MARKET GROWTH

 

High Products & Services quality is essential to profitability during low market growth periods.

INDUSTRY PRODUCTS + SERVICES QUALITY / PROFITABILITY & MARKET GROWTH

THE TARGET COMPANY

QUALITY VALUE SCALE

LOWER

SAME

HIGHER

SHORT-TERM REAL MARKET GROWTH

LOW

ROIc=****%

ROIc=****%

ROIc=****%

MEDIUM

ROIc=****%

ROIc=****%

ROIc=****%

HIGH

ROIc=****%

ROIc=****%

ROIc=****%



In having high quality products the Company will enjoy a substantially higher level of profitability even during periods of low market growth.



QUALITY IMPROVEMENT EFFECT FORECASTS


This section analyses the effects of a Quality Improvements programme and its associated expenditure in terms of the Company's Financial and Operational results.

Quality Improvement involves the re-engineering, repositioning and remarketing of existing products to meet and serve more up-market segments. In general terms the expenditure incurred is some product development costs plus additional marketing costs.

This tactic is regarded as a short or medium-term operation where the benefits are seen over a short period.

 

Quality Improvement

 

The following Excel spreadsheets (or the Access tables in the databases) should be used to produce a graphic representation of the relationship between the Company and the industry and market situation.  The links below point to the industry and market situation, and to the situation in respect of the Company:-

 

INDUSTRY & MARKET

THE TARGET COMPANY

 

QUALITY IMPROVEMENT: Market Forecast

QUALITY IMPROVEMENT: Share

QUALITY IMPROVEMENT: Market Forecast

QUALITY IMPROVEMENT: Share

 Market Definitions

 

QUALITY IMPROVEMENT: Financials

QUALITY IMPROVEMENT: Margins

QUALITY IMPROVEMENT: Financials

QUALITY IMPROVEMENT: Margins

 Financial Definitions


 

NEW PRODUCTS / PRODUCT QUALITY & PROFITABILITY

 

NEW PRODUCTS / PRODUCT QUALITY & PROFITABILITY

THE TARGET COMPANY

VALUE SCALE OF QUALITY

LOW

AVERAGE

HIGH

NEW PRODUCTS AS A FUNCTION OF TOTAL SALES

LOWER

ROIc=****%

ROIc=****%

ROIc=****%

SAME

ROIc=****%

ROIc=****%

ROIc=****%

HIGHER

ROIc=****%

ROIc=****%

ROIc=****%



The Company, if experiencing a high level of Products & Services new product introduction, will suffer in terms of overall profitability if their product quality is low.

The Company, if experiencing a high level of Product Quality, may actually benefit in profit terms in periods of limited new product introductions.




INDUSTRY PRODUCTS + SERVICES PROFITABILITY / PRODUCT QUALITY & MARKETING COSTS

 

INDUSTRY PRODUCTS + SERVICES PROFITABILITY / PRODUCT QUALITY & MARKETING COSTS

THE TARGET COMPANY

MARKETING COSTS / SALES RATIOS

LOWER

SAME

HIGHER

PRODUCT QUALITY

LOW

ROIc=****%

ROIc=****%

ROIc=****%

NORMAL

ROIc=****%

ROIc=****%

ROIc=****%

HIGH

ROIc=****%

ROIc=****%

ROIc=****%




A low Product Quality is especially critical to profitability in situations which have a high level of Marketing Costs.

When the Company has high Product Quality it is less affected by high Marketing Costs and its profitability is damaged less.



QUALITY / INDUSTRY PRODUCTS + SERVICES LIFE CYCLE / PROFITABILITY

 

QUALITY / INDUSTRY PRODUCTS + SERVICES LIFE CYCLE / PROFITABILITY

THE TARGET COMPANY

QUALITY

LOWER

SAME

HIGHER

STAGES IN THE LIFE CYCLE

EARLY

ROIc=****%

ROIc=****%

ROIc=****%

DYNAMIC

ROIc=****%

ROIc=****%

ROIc=****%

MATURE

ROIc=****%

ROIc=****%

ROIc=****%



It will be seen from the above that profitability will not be dramatically different if Products & Services quality is regarded as being 'low' or 'average'. Conversely, if Products & Services quality is regarded as being 'high', then there will be a significant improvement in profitability.

There appears to be little change in profitability at any given Quality level as Products & Services progress from introduction to the mature stage of the life cycle.


 

INDUSTRY PRODUCTS + SERVICES PROFITABILITY / DEVELOPMENT EXPENDITURE & PRODUCT QUALITY

 

INDUSTRY PRODUCTS + SERVICES PROFITABILITY / DEVELOPMENT EXPENDITURE & PRODUCT QUALITY

 THE TARGET COMPANY

PRODUCT QUALITY

LOW

AVERAGE

HIGH

DEVELOPMENT divided by SALES

LOWER

ROIc=****%

ROIc=****%

ROIc=****%

SAME

ROIc=****%

ROIc=****%

ROIc=****%

HIGHER

ROIc=****%

ROIc=****%

ROIc=****%



Mid-Range Development Expenditure appears to be very attractive in terms of profitability if used to improve Product Quality. Mid-Range Development Expenditure can benefit the Company, irrespective of the existing quality of their products, if it is applied to the improvement of Product Quality.



THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE TARGET COMPANY  TRADE CELL PRICING AND PRODUCT QUALITY

 

There is a significant difference in the Products & Services market between large share companies and their smaller competitors and their relative retail prices and product quality.

The Products & Services market is willing to accept higher prices from market leaders because it is perceived that the products from these companies will be of a higher quality. Thus market leaders have a truly attractive competitive position and are able to generate better margins and a higher profitability.

The market perception of quality not only includes the physical properties and characteristics of the product, but also the service aspects. Frequently the service aspects are more important to customers than the actual product.

 


CONCLUSIONS

 

If the Company are seeking profitability then the following questions must be asked:-
 

1.

Does the Company provide their customers with value for money?

2.

Are the Company's products of good quality?

3.

Does the Company provide a quality service to customers?

4.

Does the Company's distribution channel provide their customers with value for money, a quality service, et cetera?

5.

Do the Company adequately police their distribution channels and ensure that they are not transgressing the rules of the quality -v- price relationship?


If the answers to the above questions are in the affirmative then the Company will undoubtedly be relatively more profitable.
 

 

Company Product Cost objectives

 

THE TARGET COMPANY

 

Year1

Year2

Year3

New Production Technology Expenditure

%

*****

*****

*****

ANALYSIS MARKET CONDITIONS:

CONCLUSIONS FOR THE TARGET COMPANY:

 

MARKET FINDING

PRODUCT COST: Forecast

PRODUCT COST: Product Share

FINANCIAL CONCLUSION

PRODUCT COST: Financials

PRODUCT COST: Margins

 

 Market Definitions

 Financial Definitions




THE TARGET COMPANY'S CUSTOMERS AND BETTER PRODUCTS


 

In contrast to the smaller competitors in the Products & Services industry the market leaders tend to spend a relatively higher proportion of their turnover on investing in Development thus they are in the position of producing more advanced products.

This factor combined with product quality tends to ensure that large share companies are not only market leaders but also product leaders.

 

CONCLUSIONS

The above rationale is self-evident and the conclusions implicit here are equally evident:-

1. The need for constant product innovation and leadership

2. The need for a programme to identify customer needs and product benefits

3. The dangers of producing "me-too" products

4. The need for an effective new product development programme


 

QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURES

Target Company
Base Reference
QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURES

Overall Rating

Competitive Rating

Formalized Quality Control Systems

Quality Control Efficiency

Quality Control Development

Performance Grid Definitions


 

HISTORIC FINANCIAL INDUSTRY DATA
 

HISTORIC FINANCIAL INDUSTRY DATA

 Financial Definitions


 

 

Financial Comparisons: Scenarios

 

Target Company

Base Reference Industry

 

MEDIAN  FORECAST : Financials

MEDIAN  FORECAST : Margins & Ratios

PRODUCT LAUNCH: Financials

PRODUCT LAUNCH: Margins & Ratios

MEDIAN  FORECAST : Financials

MEDIAN  FORECAST : Margins & Ratios

PRODUCT LAUNCH: Financials

PRODUCT LAUNCH: Margins & Ratios

 

 

 Financial Definitions

 

 

Back Home Up Next